Keyword

Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Reptiles | Turtles

10 record(s)

 

Type of resources

Topics

Keywords

Contact for the resource

Provided by

Formats

Representation types

Update frequencies

Status

draft

From 1 - 10 / 10
  • Categories  

    Dugongs (Dugong dugon) are listed as vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened species and as other specially protected fauna in WA under Schedule 7 of the Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice 2015). Gaps in our knowledge in Western Australia include having a good understanding of the species’ distribution, abundance and high use areas across the northwest. This 3-year project (2014-2017) integrated Indigenous knowledge and scientific observations from field surveys to better understand the distribution, abundance and movements of dugong in the Kimberley region. The data collected also provides a baseline for future monitoring and management. This medata record relates to raw and processed aerial survey data of marine fauna collected between 21st September 2015 and 8th October 2015 in Kimberley coastal waters to the 20m bathymetry line, comprising dugongs (Dugong dugon), Australian snubfin dolphins (Orcaella heinsohni), other dolphins (bottlenose, spinners, false killer whales), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and large, mostly green turtles (Chelonia mydas). The WA Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA, ex-DPaW) and CSIRO provided additional resources to extend the North Kimberley dugong aerial survey boundary westwards (Broome to just past Port Hedland) to cover the South Kimberley-Pilbara coastal regions, to close the last remaining knowledge gap of the dugong distribution and abundance in Australia. This additional survey was completed in May 2017. Data from a trial movement study undertaken between 1-18th August 2016 also forms part of this metadata record. Five dugongs were tagged with Telonics manatee/dugong tags. GPS and ARGOS satellite detection locations and dive data were downloaded weekly from the ARGOS web site.

  • Categories  

    The dataset is a compilation of records of sea turtles caught in prawn trawls in the Northern Prawn Fishery (NPF). There are 316 records of five species. The records are from research voyages, scientific observers on commercial prawn trawlers and crew member observers on commercial prawn trawlers. More specifically, the data sources were as follows: (a) CSIRO and collaborative research voyages on RV Southern Surveyor; (b) crew member observers on NPF commercial vessels, 2003-2005 (FRDC project 2002/035, collaboration between CSIRO and AFMA, funding by FRDC); (c) scientific observers on NPF commercial vessels (FRDC project 2000/173, collaboration between CSIRO and the Australian Maritime College (AMC), funding by FRDC); (d) crew members and scientific observers on NPF commercial vessels (FRDC project 1998/202, collaboration between BRS, CSIRO, AFMA, funding by FRDC and NORMAC); (e) crew member observers and scientific observers on NPF commercial vessels and RV Southern Surveyor (FRDC project 1996/257, collaboration between CSIRO, DPIQ and AMC, funding by FRDC).

  • Torres Strait Fisheries Scientific Advisory Committee (TSFSAC) Effects of Trawling - Final Report. This project was funded by the Commonwealth Department of Primary Industries to assess the impact of trawling on the fish, turtle and selected invertebrate abundances in Torres Strait. It began in October 1983 and was completed in September 1990. The objective of the project was to put the issue into perspective by: * describing the Torres Strait prawn trawl fishery; * measuring the long-term and short-term effects of prawn trawling on fish communities; * quantifying the overlap between prawn trawling and the Islander fisheries (traditional and commercial). Refer to the final report: Poiner IR and Harris ANM. (1993) To ascertain whether prawn trawling has a significant effect on the fish, turtle and selected invertebrate populations of Torres Strait, particularly as it affects those species which are used as food by Torres Strait Islanders. Final report to TSFSAC. CSIRO Division of Fisheries, Cleveland Qld.

  • Dugong and turtle catch data, turtle sighting and laparoscope data stored for 220 individuals on Fox pro database

  • This study examined the cultural acceptability of various management options for dugongs and green turtles at Hammond Island in Torres Strait. Elders and hunters participated in semi-structured interviews to examine their perceptions about various management options for dugongs and green turtles for their community.

  • This study trialled community-based catch-monitoring strategies for dugongs and green turtles in two communities (Hammond and Thursday Islands) in the Kaiwalagal region (inner islands) of Torres Strait. Hunters completed datasheets after each hunting trip and these were collected weekly by Indigenous catch-monitors employed on the project. The catch-monitoring program was evaluated in terms of the reliability of the informaition collected and the suitability of the method to the communities. The information collected included biological information about the composition of the catch (e.g. sex ratio, size distribution, reproductive status), selectivity of the green turtle catch, catch-effort, catch-gear and the uses for which dugongs and turtles were hunted. The participating communities can use the information in future management of dugongs and green turtles in their communities.

  • Categories  

    We used a range of approaches to gain an understanding of spatial and species-related patterns in herbivory in five distinct studies. Using underwater video cameras and Sargassum myriocystum assays, 23 different fish species were observed consuming macroalgae, but seven species (Naso unicornis, Kyphosus sp., K. vaigiensis, Siganus doliatus, Scarus ghobban, S. schlegeli and initial-phase Scarus sp.) together accounted for 95% of the observed bites across five regions. Of these species, three were identified as the most important in consuming macroalgae: N. unicornis, Kyphosus sp. and K. vaigiensis. These results were supported by stable isotope analyses that incorporate nutrients from food sources over far longer periods than those examined using the assay approach. We quantified spatial patterns of macroalgal consumption and food sources across a range of scales. Firstly, across reef habitats separated by hundreds of meters, herbivory was always greatest in the structurally complex coral-dominated outer reef and reef flat habitats, which are also characterised by the highest biomass of herbivorous fish. Secondly, we showed a high degree of variability in grazing rates among regions separated by 100s km in the marine park, with different species responsible for macroalgal removal among those regions. Either N. unicornis or Kyphosus spp. were responsible for the majority of the grazing. Thirdly, we showed variability in the importance of different food sources across both habitats and regions for some consumers (e.g. Siganus spp.) but consistency for other species (e.g. Naso unicornis, Kyphosus spp.), which is likely to reflect shifts in food source availability or feeding preferences. Lastly, we found strong transcontinental differences between Keppel Islands in the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) on the east coast of Australia and Ningaloo Reef in both the diversity of the species observed feeding and on the species composition of the roving herbivorous fish community. In Ningaloo Reef, 23 species were observed biting on Sargassum, compared with just 8 in the Keppel Islands. Sargassum consumption in the Keppel Islands was dominated by a small number of species and supports the identification of Naso unicornis as a key browser species. The larger number of species feeding on macroalgae in Ningaloo Reef suggests that there may be higher functional redundancy among macroalgal consumers in this system. We also characterised the benthic community dynamics of the reef-flat and lagoon habitats to identify seasonal patterns and we experimentally determined the importance of herbivory on algae recruitment in these two habitats. Differences among habitats in algal biomass were strongly influenced by season. Lagoon habitats only had higher biomass than reef-flat habitats during part of the year (late summer/ early autumn). Herbivory had an equally strong effect on the community composition of algal recruits in the lagoon and reef flat habitats, despite the reef flat hosting a herbivorous fish community that was an order of magnitude greater in terms of biomass than the lagoon, which is characterised by younger and smaller fish (e.g. Scarus initial phase).

  • Categories  

    Ecosystem impacts of human usage and the effectiveness of zoning for biodiversity conservation: - Measures of the effectiveness of previously established sanctuary zones for protecting exploited subtidal fish and invertebrate populations. - Measures of the effectiveness of previously established sanctuary zones for protecting exploited intertidal invertebrate populations - Assessment of whether there is consistent evidence for trophic cascade effects in previously established sanctuary zones - Experimental assessment of potential for indirect effects of fishing on lagoonal and shallow water ecosystems - Assessment of adequacy of sanctuaries for exploited species and related ecological effects - Baselines for future assessment of the importance of zone size, age, configuration, location on effectiveness for protecting biodiversity - Recommendations on species and methods to be monitored to assess management effectiveness (monitoring protocols, management indicators) for intertidal and subtidal communities

  • This record is an overview entry for biological data collected on Southern Surveyor cruise SS 02/95. This cruise took place in the Gulf of Carpentaria during 13 February - 19 March 1995, under the leadership of John Salini. Biological data collected on this cruise include samples from 153 paired bycatch reduction device (BRD) prawn trawls, 4 multi-level beam trawls (MBT) and 43 environmentally friendly net (EFN) trawls. Clear video images of fish behaviour in the BRD codends of the prawn net and the EFN were also obtained. 130 fish specimens were collected for the Hobart Fish Taxonomy Group's Handbook of Commercial Fishes. Scombrids and cephalopds were collected for QDPI Fisheries. Tissue samples from L. malabaricus, L. sebae and other species were obtained for population genetic studies for the Hobart genetics group. Queensland Museum and AIMS collected sponges and invertebrates and two acoustic recordings of trawler noise and background fish sounds. 3 species of Thenus were collected for University of Queensland. 11 turtles were also tagged during prawn trawling. Please note: This metadata record is a preliminary entry derived from information in the cruise plan and/or cruise report. Individual data types - which may span several cruises - will be indexed separately within this metadata system in due course.

  • Categories  

    The Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera (IRMNG) is a provisional (or ‘interim’) compilation of genus names – including species names in many cases – and covers both living and extinct biota into a single system to support taxonomic and other queries dealing with e.g. homonyms, authorities, parent-child relationships, spelling variations and distinctions between marine and non-marine or fossil and recent taxa. Taxonomic names in IRMNG are assigned flags to distinguish between marine vs. non-marine, and extant vs. fossil status; they are also arranged into a simple management hierarchy for navigation purposes, compilation of statistics per taxonomic group and more. Fuzzy matching is also supported (using "Taxamatch") so that a misspelled name can in most instances be reconciled to a correctly spelled name at genus or species rank, where this is held. IRMNG was a project of OBIS Australia designed to assist in the provision of marine species data to OBIS, by permitting the discrimination of marine from nonmarine (and extant from fossil) species records on the basis of the genus name portion of their scientific name (normally, genus + species, or genus + species + infraspecies if applicable). The aim of the project is to (a) assemble as complete a list as possible of the estimated 150,000 extant and 50,000 fossil generic names in current use, plus their possible further 250,000-300,000 synonyms, and (b) flag as many of these as is possible with their marine/nonmarine, and extant/fossil, status. Relevant species lists are also being attached to the "correct" instances of genus names as available. IRMNG was developed and based at CSIRO, Australia from 2006-2014, and from 2016 onwards it is now hosted at VLIZ, Belgium: http://www.irmng.org/